| This book was written in 
                  1983, and as such is a good 200 years out of period. The date 
                  at which the novel is set is never precisely established, though 
                  details such as London's pea soup fogs and steam trains would 
                  seem to indicate a date in the 19th C or early 20th C. This 
                  deliberate vagueness is quite in keeping with the tendency of 
                  the Gothic genre towards archaism; the terrors and horrors of 
                  the fiction can be enjoyed at a safe arm's length by being placed 
                  in the past. In classic Gothic fiction, however, the action 
                  also takes place far away: The Monks 
                  set in Spain, Udolpho moves between 
                  Italy and France, Dracula is 
                  located in various parts of Eastern Europe, as well as London, 
                  but is another late piece of Gothic (1897). In Northanger 
                  Abbey Henry Tilney chastises Catherine for believing 
                  that Gothic excesses could take place in, for them, contemporary 
                  England. The action of The Woman in 
                  Black does take place in England, but it is a very "remote 
                  part of England" (p26) which almost seems to be 
                  a world apart. Eel Marsh House, cut off from the rest of the 
                  area by the salt marshes and only sometimes connected by the 
                  Nine Lives Causeway (and how about that for a superstitious 
                  place name?) might as well be in Spain, for all its connection 
                  with the civilised world of England, located in Arthur Kipps' 
                  mind in London, smog notwithstanding. Chapter 1 - Christmas Eve The opening paragraph introduces the protagonist of the novel 
                  and its narrator. This novel is told as 1st person narrative, 
                  which is not traditional to the genre. Both Lewis and Radcliffe 
                  used the technique of omniscient narrator which gives the scope 
                  to be everywhere at once whilst presenting events through the 
                  eyes of a variety of characters. The 1st person technique used 
                  here identifies us exclusively with Kipps and his viewpoint. 
                  This is valuable later as we are forced to share his intense 
                  feelings about the events at Eel Marsh House without any opportunity 
                  to escape. (Charlotte Bronte also uses 1st person narrator in 
                  Jane Eyre, another out of period 
                  Gothic novel. Dracula, by using 
                  various characters' journals, takes advantage both of the dramatic 
                  impact of 1st person narrative and the ability to switch viewpoint. 
                  ) Immediately the narrator is shown to be slightly removed from 
                  the society around him - a little alienated, though he is voluntarily 
                  excluding himself at this point. He is, of course, telling the 
                  story retrospectively, which means he tells it in such a way 
                  that the reader is always a step ahead of the narrator, having 
                  the hindsight which he lacked at the time.
                  As the narrative continues and Kipps fills in the background 
                  to his present situation we see why he should hold himself aloof 
                  in this way. This novel is told in flashback; the main events 
                  of the novel happen before the novel begins. 
                  The name of the house in which Kipps is now living is Monk's 
                  Piece, which has Gothic overtones which don't seem to go anywhere. 
                  Maybe it's just to create ambience. However, Kipps' discovery 
                  of the house and his claim to  "an absolute conviction that I would come 
                  here again, that the house was already mine, bound to me invisibly"(p12)  are redolent of Gothic superstition and supernatural, though 
                  the supernatural events of the novel do not actually happen 
                  there. The description of the way the weather has been and of 
                  the isolated nature of Monk's Piece suggest a kind of toned 
                  down, domesticated Gothic. In his admiration of nature Kipps is associated with the type 
                  of Gothic and Sentimental hero who find the sublime in the contemplation 
                  of nature and whose moral worth is gauged by their response 
                  to the beauties of the natural world. Later in the chapter, 
                  however, care is taken to establish Kipps' Augustan credentials; 
                 "I had never been an imaginative or fanciful 
                  man and certainly not one given to visions of the future" 
                  (p13)
                  - though we begin to see that he clings to this Augustanism 
                  through fear; earlier he has mentioned 
                 "occasional nervous illnesses and conditions, 
                  as a result of the experiences I will come to relate" 
                  (p11) 
                  and we now learn that 
                 "since those earlier experiences (he) had 
                  deliberately avoided all contemplation of any remotely non- 
                  material matters, and clung to the prosaic, the visible and 
                  tangible." (p13)
                  Certainly he sees the value of a lack of sensibility; whereas 
                  his wife wishes her daughter to be 
                 "a little less staid, a little more spirited, 
                  even frivolous", (p16)
                  Kipps is happy with his step- daughter's Augustan qualities, 
                  seeing in them a protection for her; 
                 "I would not have wished for anything to 
                  ruffle the surface of that calm, untroubled sea." (p16)
                  Through both of these characters we see Augustanism presented 
                  as the safe option. This can be compared with St Aubert's desire 
                  to keep Emily safe from sentimental excesses by rooting her 
                  in reason. Within the Gothic genre reason is seen as the safe 
                  place whilst sentiment and superstition (and sexuality, but 
                  we'll get to that later) are seen as dangerous. We have talked 
                  about the tendency of Gothic writers to only go so far in their 
                  Gothic rebellion before retreating to the safety of the known.
                  Hints as to some traumatic event in Kipps' past continue to 
                  be dropped in this chapter, with reference to
                  "the long shadow cast by the events of 
                  the past" (p14) 
                 We learn that these events happened at Eel Marsh House subsequent 
                  to the death of Mrs Drablow and, despite his current happy situation, 
                  still have the power to fill him 
                 "with mortal dread and terror of spirit" 
                  (p15)
                  This technique of generating and building suspense is very 
                  Gothic and owes much to Radcliffe who used it to great effect 
                  in Udolpho with regard to the black veil, the mysterious apparitions 
                  and disapparitions from the locked chamber, the inexplicable 
                  voices in the walls and other more minor mysteries. 
                  When the family begin to tell ghost stories, all of the Gothic 
                  cliches spill out, of -  "dripping stone walls in uninhabited castles 
                  and of ivy-clad monastery ruins by moonlight, of locked inner 
                  rooms and secret dungeons, dank charnel houses and overgrown 
                  graveyards, of footsteps creaking upon staircases and fingers 
                  tapping at casements, of howlings and shriekings, groanings 
                  and scuttlings and the clanking of chains, of hooded monks and 
                  headless horsemen, swirling mists and sudden winds, insubstantial 
                  spectres and sheeted creatures, vampires and bloodhounds, bats 
                  and rats and spiders, of men found at dawn and women turned 
                  white haired and raving lunatic, and of vanished corpses and 
                  curses upon heirs". (p19)  Kipps describes these stories as wild and silly, yet the unease 
                  they create in him suggests that  "the rising flood of memory" (p19)  is bringing with it something to match or outdo these tales, 
                  which makes him feel an "outsider 
                  to their circle" (p19). His response to being asked 
                  to contribute a story is extreme; he loses track of himself 
                  for fifteen minutes in "a frenzy 
                  of agitation" (p21). All this is leading up to his 
                  confession that  "I had a story, a true story, a story of 
                  haunting and evil, fear and confusion, horror and tragedy" 
                  (p21)  and that the memory of it is "like 
                  an old wound" (p22). Kipps determines to commit 
                  his story to paper, as a kind of exorcism, thus setting up the 
                  context for our possession of the narrative. At the close of the chapter all our expectations are in place, 
                  our hero has been characterised as a trustworthy narrator of 
                  sound Augustan values and suspense has been generated; we want 
                  to know what Kipps' much hinted at experience actually was. Chapter 2 - A London Particular The fog described at the beginning of this chapter has, in 
                  physical terms, the same effect as is experienced within Gothic 
                  fiction when characters become decontextualised - 
                 "disguising the familiar world and confusing 
                  the people in it" (p25).
                  This smog, though rooted entirely in natural causes, creates 
                  a traditionally Gothic ambience of darkness and uncertainty. 
                  That Kipps should begin his adventure on such a day is entirely 
                  in keeping with the Gothic technique of using landscape and 
                  weather to indicate forthcoming events and emotional states. 
                  The vocabulary chosen conjures up images of Hell - 
                 "sulpherous yellow light... flares... red-hot 
                  pools of light... a great, boiling cauldron... evil red smoke... 
                  red-eyed and demonic" (p26-27)
                  and there is specific reference to Dante's Inferno. In retrospect 
                  this language can be seen to reflect the personal hell he is 
                  shortly to enter, though it equally serves as a graphic description 
                  of a foggy November day in London at that unspecified time in 
                  history.
                  In this chapter Kipps is told of his destination - Eel Marsh 
                  House, across the Nine Lives Causeway. As is typical of Gothic 
                  novels, the exact location of Eel Marsh - "in 
                  ____ shire" (p29) is not revealed, though a series 
                  of credible directions is given. This gives the advantages of 
                  an aura of reality together with anonymity, thus preserving 
                  maximum terror possibilities. The fact that access to Eel Marsh 
                  is determined by the tide increases the potential for isolation 
                  and decontextualisation. At this point in the novel Kipps himself 
                  is aware that the situation sounds fictional: 
                 "The business was beginning to sound like 
                  something from a Victorian novel" (p31).
                  This adds to his Augustan credentials as a "sturdy, 
                  commonsensical fellow" (p26) We read 
                 "I saw that Mr Bentley had not been able 
                  to resist making a good story better, and dramatising the mystery 
                  of Mrs Drablow in her queer-sounding house a good way beyond 
                  the facts" (p31).
                  Plainly he is not expecting anything out of the ordinary to 
                  happen; he is no Catherine Morland.
 
                  At the end of the chapter we are thrown somewhat to read of 
                  his fiancee, Stella, given that we know him to be married to 
                  Esme. However, subsequent events push this inconsistency from 
                  our minds until events resolve the discrepancy. The ground for 
                  future plot events is very subtly and economically laid in this 
                  way. Chapter 3- The Journey North
                  In this seemingly uneventful chapter we meet Samuel Daily, who 
                  will become important later.
                  It's not so much what he says in this chapter that is relevant, 
                  so much as how he says it; when Kipps teases him "you're 
                  not going to start telling me strange tales of lonely houses?" 
                  we read "He gave me a straight look. 
                 "No", he said at last, "I am not." 
                  (p37)
                  The straight look and the fact that the response was not immediate 
                  suggests that all is not being revealed.
                  We are reminded of he geographical isolation of the area -  " I .. was feeling an unpleasnt sensation 
                  of being isolated far from any human dwelling ," (p38)  and informed of some useful Gothic architecure -  "a good wild ruin of an abbey with a handsome 
                  graveyard" (p38).  Kipps feels that Daily has been exaggerating  "the bleakness and strangeness of the area" 
                  (p39)  but this does not prove to be the case. Chapter 4 - The Funeral of Mrs Drablow Once again it is the manner of Mr Daily's delivery rather 
                  than what he says that makes an impact; he offers Kipps his 
                  card "should you need 
                  anyone.." (p40) and meets with a "straight" 
                  (pagain) stare Kipps' suggestion that the business will be straightforward. 
                  We receive the distinct impression that there is a mystery here, 
                  and Daily knows more than he is letting on.   
                    |